Two types of poets

 franklin
Ben Franklin

 NEW
 
Innovation
coverage
online

Innovator tours of museums in Paris

Tips for success in old age

Sol LeWitt,
 finder

Give Ralph Ellison a break

Greatest
women
artists

How Disney Imagineers innovate

Clint Eastwood, seeker
(Feb. 4)

The complex
 case of Fernando Botero
(Jan. 21 and 30)

Innovators
in academia
(Jan. 10)

Orson Welles and John Milton!
(Dec. 14)

Major League Baseball
as experimental innovator
 (Dec. 13)

Walt Disney
as finder
(Dec. 12)

Inventor Stanford Ovshinsky as aging finder
(Dec. 9)

Morris Louis
 as seeker
(Nov. 18)

 

Comparing experimental and conceptual poets

This chart lists contrasting characteristics of poets who are seekers and those who are finders. Poets tend to have some of their category’s typical characteristics, not all of them.

 

SEEKER

FINDER

 

Experimental innovator

Conceptual innovator

 

 

 

Archetype

Old master

Young genius

Prime example

Robert Frost

T.S. Eliot

Quote

“Young people have insight. They have a flash here and a flash there … It is later in the dark of life that you see forms, constellations. And it is the constellations that are philosophy.”

-- Frost          

“Most men either cling to the experiences of youth, so that their writing becomes an insincere mimicry of their earlier work, or they leave their passion behind, and write only from the head, with a hollow and wasted virtuosity.”

-- Eliot      

Characteristics

 

 

When they typically do their best work

Later in career.

Early in career.

Length of time devoted to creating their best work

Extended period of continual striving for mastery. Often they work in one form of poetry for a long time.

Sudden breakthrough. They often switch from one form of poetry to another; versatile in many forms of poetry.

Focus of their poems

 

Emphasis on subject matter. Their work often involves extensive observation, grows out of study of the external world.

Emphasis on technique. Based on imagination. Their work often involves introspection, grows out of study of earlier poetry.

Their style

Language may be relatively informal, vernacular, concrete, concerned with specifics.

Language may be relatively formal, sophisticated, aimed at universality.

Preparation and working methods

May start writing without planning the poem in advance. May rewrite often, have difficulty completing poems.

Often write quickly.

How they evaluate their poems

Unsure of achievements, stick to one form that they try to perfect.

Feel have solved specific problems, move on to new forms.

How they are received

Praised for craft and wisdom

Praised for brilliance and genius

 

Copyright © 2007 by Colin Stewart. All rights reserved.